The Kensington Rune Stone

members.aol.com
Visit Site

William Bakken finds Blegen's arguments convincing, i.e., that "expert runologists" have pronounced the inscription a fraud and that people capable of this level of forgery were present in the Kensington area in the 1890s. Bibliography is longer than the article.

Visits
294
Added
May 3, 2025
Rating
(111)
Rate This Site
QR Code
QR code Download PNG
Embed Badge
Place this code on your website to show you're listed here.
Get the best links delivered weekly — hand-picked from 1,200,810 resources