The Kensington Rune Stone
members.aol.comWilliam Bakken finds Blegen's arguments convincing, i.e., that "expert runologists" have pronounced the inscription a fraud and that people capable of this level of forgery were present in the Kensington area in the 1890s. Bibliography is longer than the article.
Rate This Site
Embed Badge
Place this code on your website to show you're listed here.